|
It
is not so much an honor to know Latin, as it is a pity not to
know it. Cicero
+
T.
Feeney, "Addictissimus: how to close a Latin letter" The
Jurist 17 (1957) 342-345.
Benedic, Domine,
nos, haec et tua dona, quae de tua largitate sumus sumpturi. Per
Christum Dominum nostrum. Amen.
It is not surprising,
therefore, that a comprehensive dictionary has eluded us. Almost
none of the modern dictionaries covers the whole alphabet, but
for basic purposes it is possible to get by with a good
dictionary of Classical Latin and a selective dictionary of
Medieval Latin. R. Sharpe, writing in Mantello & Riggs,
Medieval Latin, at
93. |
|
Catholic
Issues
Ecclesiastical
Latin
SHMS Students, see:
On-Line
Syllabus for SHMS Latin 121 & 122 or
On-Line
Syllabus for SHMS Intensive Intermediate Latin
General
|
Ecclesiastical Latin is that form of Latin that emerged from
Classical Latin beginning about the 4th century A.D. Despite being
gradually replaced by various vernacular tongues up through the 16th
century, ecclesiastical Latin has been used continuously by the Catholic
Church as its primary language to the present day. It is somewhat easier to learn than is Classical Latin because Ecclesiastical
Latin more closely resembles modern vernacular usage patterns than does Classical
Latin (for example, by its making greater use of prepositions). A working knowledge of Ecclesiastical Latin affords one direct access to nearly
two millennia of accumulated Christian wisdom. The Church
has repeatedly called on its priests (most recently,
1983 CIC 249) and others to acquire facility in Latin. She recommends that all of her members
know at least their
basic prayers in the ancient and common tongue of
Christians. |

St.
Jerome
Patron of Latinists |
Resources
Dr. Peters has been helping children, young people, and
adults learn Ecclesiastical Latin for many years. For a textbook he uses John Collins, A Primer of Ecclesiastical Latin
(Catholic University of America, 1985/1988/1990).
Dr. Peters' approach emphasizes the early memorization of basic prayers, poems,
and songs in order
to assist students in applying Ecclesiastical Latin in their own lives, and
later, providing them with a storehouse of familiar grammatical examples. (For
a much larger selection of Latin prayers and resources than can be posted here,
go to Thesaurus Precum
Latinarum. Vide etiam FAMILIÆ
SANCTI HIERONYMI.)
|
Prayers of the
Rosary
Certain poems & songs
Gospel
Canticles
Creed "Quicumque"
Latin Prepositions Chart
Latin Declensions
Nouns (Decl. IV & V)
|
Thanks to the work of many generations of paleographers and textual
critics we now have all the ancient texts in printed editions which are
both easy to read and more correct than any of the surviving
manuscripts. This is not, however, the case with texts from the Middle
Ages, since there are many more of them [in fact, hundreds of
thousands] and they have attracted much
less interest from Latin specialists. Many of them, even ones that are
well worth reading, have been published using only one manuscript that
happened to be to hand, even though much better manuscripts may exist.
Many more texts have not been published at all, but are waiting in
libraries for someone to read them and prepare an edition. There is a
limitless amount of valuable work waiting to be done by those who
would like to devote themselves to Latin and the Middle Ages. Tore Janson, A Natural History of Latin (Oxford, 2004) at 122. |
In addition to Collins'
primer, serious beginning students of Ecclesiastical Latin
should consider acquiring the following books:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Some more thoughts on
Latin Resources (for English speakers):
Grammars,
Ecclesiastical
-
John F.
Collins, Primer of Ecclesiastical Latin,
Catholic University of America Press, 1985, 1988 et seq.
The single best book for learning Latin as used by the Church from about the 4th
century to the present day. Includes numerous liturgical and Scriptural
examples. The original 1985 edition had some typographical errors which have
been eliminated from later versions. An answer key is due out late 2006, from CUA Press.
-
Scanlon & Scanlon,
Latin Grammar & Second Latin. A
2-volume set geared to philosophy, theology, and canon law. First appeared in
1948 and was widely used.
This work was popular in religious
circles before Vatican II, and aimed only at giving priests and, even more,
nuns, an ability to read liturgical Latin. It is actually somewhat more
sophisticated than that, and makes a good supplement for those working through
Collins or Wheelock. But I do not think that it is a good
stand-alone textbook for beginners, especially for those trying to
learn Latin on their own. There are too few
explanations offered and it really needs a teacher to explain
things. In any event, try to find a used hard-back copy. The
modern reprints I've seen are paperback, cheaply glued, and fall
apart with minimal usage.
-
Vincent Huber,
Latin for Sisters: A Practical Guide to
Breviary-Latin, Tabernacle and Purgatory Press, 1919, 1931. Neither
intended for nor capable of teaching Latin as a whole, this work instead focuses
on points of grammar and syntax needed to get a decent idea of what the prayers
of the Divine Office mean. For all its obvious limitations, there are a good
number of very practical translation tips in here, and it’s well worth a read by
those who already have a decent grasp of Church Latin.
-
Mary Perkins,
Your Catholic Language: Latin from the
Missal (1940). Using interlinear translations of Mass prayers, Perkins
walks one through many (not all, despite her claim) of the important parts of
ecclesiastical Latin grammar. Those points she discusses are quite clear and I
find the book helpful as a set of self-guided exercises for those who can get
fuller explanations elsewhere. (nb: I have seen used copies for sale on the
Internet, astonishingly over-priced.)
-
Rhoda Hendricks,
Latin Made Simple, Cadillac Pub.,
1962. Part of a self-teaching mini-encyclopedia series, this book, while
intended as an overview of classical Latin, is actually just as useful for
learning ecclesiastical Latin, and so I list here. Makes an excellent supplement
for a full grammar book.
-
O. Kuhnmuench,
Liturgical Latin (Loyola
Chicago, 1939). Little more than organized classroom readings; a few grammatical
and vocabulary tips.
-
H. Nunn,
An Introduction to Ecclesiastical Latin (Cambridge, 1922).
The more I use this, the more I like it. Written by a classicist who did not
want to waste words. A reference work, not a teaching text.
-
A. Blaise,
A Handbook of Christian Latin: Style,
Morphology, and Syntax [1955], Eng. trans from French G. Roti
(Georgetown University, 1994). Another recent find, but look quite interesting.
Grammars,
Classical
-
Frederick Wheelock,
Latin: An Introductory Course Based on
Ancient Authors, Barnes & Noble Outline, 1956 et seq. One of the two or
three really great modern grammars for classical Latin, this one has the
advantage of teaching declensions in the usual ecclesiastical order, and
providing copiously footnoted sample readings. There is also available by Groton
& May a short reader, Latin Stories, Bolchazy-Carducci, 1986, 1989, designed
around Wheelock.
-
Allen & Greenough’s
New Latin Grammar for Schools and
Colleges, Ginn & Company, 1888, 1903. A gold mine of technical classical
Latin grammar, but still quite useful for those whose needs lean toward
ecclesiastical Latin.
-
J. Mountford,
“Bradley’s Arnold” Latin Prose
Composition, Longmans, Green & Co., revised 1938. Reworking of a famous
textbook, the grammar is designed to facilitate Latin-to-English reading and
English-to-Latin composition. Assumes that the student already has a solid grasp
of declensions and conjugations.
-
Jenny’s First Year Latin, Allyn
and Bacon, 1979 et seq. An engaging way for younger people to learn classical
Latin, (lots of neat pictures, etc.). Nicely done (though I have not used it
with kids.)
-
H. Oerberg,
Lingua Latina, Nature Method
Language Institutes, 1954, 1965. Several volumes, teaches Latin by actually
reading it first (with the help of pictures and simple sentences) and then
explaining, albeit briefly, the grammar. Interesting approach, but requires the
assistance of a tutor.
-
C. Bennett,
A Latin Grammar (Allyn &
Bacon, 1895). The few times I have used it, it's been helpful.
Dictionaries (most "classical"
but quite useful for ecclesiastical Latin)
-
Lewis & Short,
A Latin Dictionary, Oxford
University Press. Among one-volume, still-affordable, dictionaries, this one
reigns supreme. Always called "Lewis & Short". Essential for advanced work.
-
Cassell’s New Latin Dictionary,
Funk & Wagnalls. Excellent.
-
The New College Latin & English
Dictionary, Bantam Books. Very useful.
-
Langenscheidt Pocket Latin Dictionary.
From a German company famous for dictionaries, it’s small, rugged, and easy to
use. Great for camping trips.
-
A Latin-English Dictionary of St.
Thomas Aquinas, St. Paul Editions. Nicely done, and large.
-
A. Souter,
A Glossary of Later Latin to 600 AD
(Oxford, 1949 on). Useful.
-
Latin Dictionary and Grammar Aid
(University of Notre Dame).
-
Wilfrid Diamond,
Dictionary of Liturgical Latin
(Bruce, 1961). Why isn't this better known? It's quite nicely done.
Audio Learning Systems
-
S. Seidl, Cursus Linguae Latinae
Vivae, Family of St. Jerome, text and audio tapes. Geared to
ecclesiastical (emphasis on Scriptural) Latin, this series by a Vatican Latin
master teaches Latin as the living language it is. Comes with printed support
materials. Can be used a stand-alone, but is even better when fleshed out with
a standard grammar book.
-
Educational Services,
Language/30 Latin, 2 audio tapes with Latin phrases and a very little
grammar. Ruthlessly classical in pronunciation (except for a few minutes), but
interesting for a one-time listen.
Other
-
F.
Mantello & A Rigg,
Medieval Latin: An Introduction and Bibliographic Guide
(Catholic University of America, 1996). An amazing resource that
I only recently discovered. Not a grammar, lexicon, or reader.
Instead, just about everything else!
-
R. Moore,
Comparative Greek and
Latin Syntax (Bell, 1934/1948; Bristol Classics,
2000). Even if you don't know Greek, this is a still very handy
reference for Latin syntax. Highly-regarded (and might make you
want to take the plunge into Greek, after all!)
-
J. Mantinband,
Dictionary of Latin
Literature (Philosophical Library, 1956). Not
vocabulary, of course, but rather lists works, authors, etc. Surveys up
to the Renaissance.
|